Francesca Palombini has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lisp-sec-26: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-sec/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- # ART AD Review of draft-ietf-lisp-sec-26 cc @fpalombini Thank you for the work on this document. I only have a couple of very minor comments, easy to fix - feel free to take them or leave them. Francesca ## Comments ### DTLS reference Please add a reference to RFC 9147 on the first occurrence of DTLS in the text. ### + undefined Section 6.5: ``` * per-msg-key = KDF( nonce + s + PSK[Key ID] ) ``` It should be explicitly stated in the text what operations "+" denotes in this specification. ## Notes This review is in the ["IETF Comments" Markdown format][ICMF], You can use the [`ietf-comments` tool][ICT] to automatically convert this review into individual GitHub issues. [ICMF]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md [ICT]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
