Ciao Francesca, Thanks you for reading the document. I’ll ask the authors to include your comments.
Ciao L. > On 15 Jun 2022, at 23:59, Francesca Palombini via Datatracker > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Francesca Palombini has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-lisp-sec-26: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-sec/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > # ART AD Review of draft-ietf-lisp-sec-26 > > cc @fpalombini > > Thank you for the work on this document. > > I only have a couple of very minor comments, easy to fix - feel free to take > them or leave them. > > Francesca > > ## Comments > > ### DTLS reference > > Please add a reference to RFC 9147 on the first occurrence of DTLS in the > text. > > ### + undefined > > Section 6.5: > ``` > * per-msg-key = KDF( nonce + s + PSK[Key ID] ) > ``` > It should be explicitly stated in the text what operations "+" denotes in > this specification. > > ## Notes > > This review is in the ["IETF Comments" Markdown format][ICMF], You can use the > [`ietf-comments` tool][ICT] to automatically convert this review into > individual GitHub issues. > > [ICMF]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md > [ICT]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments > > > _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
