Hi! I know everyone has been busy working on the base specifications — thanks for that!
However, it has been a while and I haven’t seen any movement on this document. Including deployment experience and the discussion about the change of status. What’s the plan to move this forward? Thanks! Alvaro. On April 26, 2022 at 9:37:07 AM, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal) ( [email protected]) wrote: Sounds good Alvaro. We’re already collecting some deployment experience as per the chairs suggestion. We’ll send an updated draft to the list once ready. Thanks! Aberto *From: *Alvaro Retana <[email protected]> *Date: *Tuesday, April 26, 2022 at 1:22 PM *To: *Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal) <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> *Cc: *[email protected] <[email protected]>, Luigi Iannone <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> *Subject: *Re: AD Review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 Alberto: Hi! I don’t have an objection with changing the status. However, I would be interested in any deployment experience. In any case, please make sure that a change is discussed on the mailing list — start a new thread so it doesn’t end up buried in this one. Thanks! Alvaro. On April 26, 2022 at 6:02:23 AM, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal) ( [email protected]) wrote: One quick reply regarding the intended status. As discussed in Vienna, it seems that this one could be moved into Standards Track. The plan for the next iteration is to update the intended status to Proposed Standard.
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
