Hi Alberto, Indeed the LISP WG Chair asked about this a while ago ;-)
Ciao L. > On 26 Apr 2022, at 15:37, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal) <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Sounds good Alvaro. We’re already collecting some deployment experience as > per the chairs suggestion. We’ll send an updated draft to the list once ready. > > Thanks! > Aberto > > From: Alvaro Retana <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Date: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 at 1:22 PM > To: Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal) <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>, [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > Cc: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>, Luigi Iannone <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Subject: Re: AD Review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 > > Alberto: > > Hi! > > I don’t have an objection with changing the status. However, I would be > interested in any deployment experience. > > In any case, please make sure that a change is discussed on the mailing list > — start a new thread so it doesn’t end up buried in this one. > > Thanks! > > Alvaro. > > On April 26, 2022 at 6:02:23 AM, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal) > ([email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>) wrote: > > One quick reply regarding the intended status. As discussed in Vienna, it > seems that this one could be moved into Standards Track. The plan for the > next iteration is to update the intended status to Proposed Standard.
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
