On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 10:09 AM Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Thanks for the review Erik! Not sure what would be the preferred way to > proceed here, since PubSub is a nice to have but not required optimization > of RFC 9301. Would like to hear what others think. > > The Map-Request registry can point to both 9301 and the new LISP PubSub > RFC. > That works, yes. I was wondering about the fact that the message itself just grew an extra 2 fields. Up to you. Alvaro knows full well the discussions around "what does 'Updates:' actually mean." Thanks!
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
