> LISP Mobility: candidate document LISP-MN but does not solve everything 
> should we enlarge the scope?

draft-ietf-lisp-eid-mobility as well. 

> LISP Yang Model: We are pretty close to finish this one
> LISP NAT Traversal: we have a candidate document

And VPNs are in charter and used quite a lot in LISP deployments, so 
draft-ietf-lisp-vpn.

Alternative Mapping System Design is part of the charter and the only draft 
that is pending is draft-farinacci-lisp-decent but not sure this needs to be 
standardized.

And we need to decide the outcome of draft-ietf-lisp-te and control-plane 
security such as draft-ietf-lisp-ecdsa-auth and draft-ietf-eid-anonymity. I'm 
not sure they need to be standards track. 

Dino

_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

Reply via email to