> Dino, > Back then Albert Lopez, Vina and others invested quite some time addressing > in draft-ermagan-lisp-nat-traversal a lot of corner cases that were coming > from mobiity. > > Before we move forward with a NAT document we should make sure we either > explicitly leave out those use cases, or address them.
Agree, just having basic LISP NAT-traversal standardized, or even just documented, should be our key goal. Or it limits LISP deployments to virually no where. Meaning, just within firewall/security domains. Dino _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
