I propose that we change the wording of "Standard Track Documents: The core specifications of LISP have been published as “Standard Track” [references]. The WG will continue moving select specifications to “Standard Track”."
Propose we add some language to cover incremental features, behaviors and specifications in this section. Thanks Padma On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 3:58 PM Prakash Jain (prakjain) <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > > Should we include ‘External connectivity’ ( > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jain-lisp-site-external-connectivity/) > work too in the charter as its close to the adoption or it needs to be > adopted first? > > Thanks, > > Prakash > > > > > > *From: *lisp <[email protected]> on behalf of Alberto Rodriguez-Natal > (natal) <[email protected]> > *Date: *Monday, October 9, 2023 at 3:25 PM > *To: *Padma Pillay-Esnault <[email protected]>, LISP mailing list list > <[email protected]> > *Cc: *[email protected] <[email protected]> > *Subject: *Re: [lisp] Proposed WG Charter on GitHub > > Hi all, > > > > I need to catch up with the conversation on this thread (I’ll get to that > soon). > > > > I wanted to send a quick note that we missed Reliable Transport on the new > charter, but I see that Luigi has opened a PR on that today, thanks Luigi! > > > > Alberto > > > > *From: *Padma Pillay-Esnault <[email protected]> > *Date: *Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 7:46 PM > *To: *LISP mailing list list <[email protected]> > *Cc: *[email protected] <[email protected]> > *Subject: *Proposed WG Charter on GitHub > > Hello all, > > > > We have created a repository to gather input for the proposed LISP WG > charter presented in our last meeting. > > > > A pointer to the repo below > > https://github.com/lisp-wg/wg-charter > > > > We welcome your comments and contributions. > > > > Thanks > > Padma and Luigi >
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
