Hi Alberto, > On Oct 11, 2023, at 14:33, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal) <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi all, > > A few thoughts on the charter after going through the latest revision and the > discussion on this thread. > > * We have a milestone for LCAFbis, but LCAF is not mentioned in the work > items. Is LCAF supposed to be covered by the “Standards Track Documents” work > item? Same for DDT. If so, I would mention them as examples of possible > “Standards Track Documents”. Also, I agree with Padma that we should extend > the work item to include “language to cover incremental features, behaviors > and specifications”. >
The idea was not to list all candidates, but you are right that if we have them in the milestones…. > * I think the external connectivity work item could be generalized to cover > both the external-connectivity draft as well as any other work adjacent to > 6832, for instance something like: > > “LISP Internetworking: [RFC6832] defines the Proxy ETR element, to be used to > connect LISP sites with non-LISP sites. However, LISP deployments could > benefit from more advanced internetworking, for instance by defining > mechanism to discover such external connectivity.” Ack > > * Similar comment for TE. I think we could be more general, something like: > > “Traffic Engineering and LISP: Specifics on how to do traffic engineering on > LISP deployments could be useful, for instance some use cases…” Ack > > * On the milestones section, I think LCAFbis could be done much sooner. Also, > I agree with Dino we should have name-encoding sooner as well (this is partly > my fault, I’m halfway on my shepherds writeup, will try to close on that). If we finish something sooner than expected there is no harm. > > * Based on the discussion on San Francisco, it is not entirely clear to me > the consensus of the WG regarding “Submitting a LISP Applicability document > to the IESG”. Would it be possible to leave this milestone somehow more open? What do you mean exactly by “more open”? Ciao L. > > > I’m also planning to send a PR on GitHub with some editorial comments. > > Thanks, > Alberto > > From: Padma Pillay-Esnault <[email protected]> > Date: Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 7:46 PM > To: LISP mailing list list <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Subject: Proposed WG Charter on GitHub > > Hello all, > > We have created a repository to gather input for the proposed LISP WG charter > presented in our last meeting. > > A pointer to the repo below > https://github.com/lisp-wg/wg-charter > > We welcome your comments and contributions. > > Thanks > Padma and Luigi
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
