Hi, I think so. The best option is to list them in the same order as the milestones.
I will try to propose a new order today/tomorrow CIao > On Oct 11, 2023, at 13:26, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal) <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Padma, > > Just to confirm, is the end goal to have a single list of items then? (that > is, not divided into two groups) > > Thanks, > Alberto > > From: Padma Pillay-Esnault <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > Date: Friday, October 6, 2023 at 4:14 AM > To: Alvaro Retana <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Cc: LISP mailing list list <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>, > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > Subject: Re: [lisp] Proposed WG Charter on GitHub > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 5:14 PM Alvaro Retana <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > (1) What’s the difference between the work items in “Part 1” and the ones in > “Part 2”? > > PPE - originally we had in part 1 work that were promised and part 2 grouping > work in progress. Will fix the document and remove the "part" for clarity.
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
