Sounds good, thanks Luigi. Alberto
From: Luigi Iannone <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, October 11, 2023 at 2:32 PM To: Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal) <[email protected]> Cc: Padma Pillay-Esnault <[email protected]>, Alvaro Retana <[email protected]>, LISP mailing list list <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [lisp] Proposed WG Charter on GitHub Hi, I think so. The best option is to list them in the same order as the milestones. I will try to propose a new order today/tomorrow CIao On Oct 11, 2023, at 13:26, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal) <[email protected]> wrote: Padma, Just to confirm, is the end goal to have a single list of items then? (that is, not divided into two groups) Thanks, Alberto From: Padma Pillay-Esnault <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Friday, October 6, 2023 at 4:14 AM To: Alvaro Retana <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: LISP mailing list list <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [lisp] Proposed WG Charter on GitHub On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 5:14 PM Alvaro Retana <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: (1) What’s the difference between the work items in “Part 1” and the ones in “Part 2”? PPE - originally we had in part 1 work that were promised and part 2 grouping work in progress. Will fix the document and remove the "part" for clarity.
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
