Some mostly non-technical thoughts on this I-D which caught my eye Abstract I find a bit sparse - what does the YANG module enable a user to do? Configure, manage, monitor, ...
I like the choice of module names and prefixes - so often these are a melange. In the YANG module WG Web is ood as are the references to lisp-lcaf-10 but I think that those should be RFCYYYY or some such and not a URI references to BSD license is ood There is a mixture of XXX and XXXX which I think refer to the same I-D - consistency is good I note you switched from Enumeration to Identity. As I think you know, the former have stronger change control, the latter none so a vendor can add new roles. I am not sure if this is a good idea. You have the same string pattern five times; worth a derived type, unless you think that they are going to diverge /locartors/locators/ references in the YANG module must appear in the I-D references; I do not see RFC2404 RFC4868 lisp-lcaf which I think should be RFCyyyy or some such IANA address family numbers The IP addresses use the form that includes a zone of indeterminate length; is this intended? reference clause for the revision should be to this document IANA Considerations is double line spaced HTH Tom Petch _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
