Thanks Tom :-) L.
> On Oct 13, 2023, at 13:56, tom petch <[email protected]> wrote: > > Some mostly non-technical thoughts on this I-D which caught my eye > > Abstract I find a bit sparse - what does the YANG module enable a user to do? > Configure, manage, monitor, ... > > I like the choice of module names and prefixes - so often these are a melange. > > In the YANG module > > WG Web is ood > as are the references to lisp-lcaf-10 but I think that those should be > RFCYYYY or some such and not a URI > > references to BSD license is ood > > There is a mixture of XXX and XXXX which I think refer to the same I-D - > consistency is good > > I note you switched from Enumeration to Identity. As I think you know, the > former have stronger change control, the latter none so a vendor can add new > roles. I am not sure if this is a good idea. > > You have the same string pattern five times; worth a derived type, unless you > think that they are going to diverge > > /locartors/locators/ > > references in the YANG module must appear in the I-D references; I do not see > RFC2404 > RFC4868 > lisp-lcaf which I think should be RFCyyyy or some such > IANA address family numbers > > The IP addresses use the form that includes a zone of indeterminate length; > is this intended? > > reference clause for the revision should be to this document > > IANA Considerations is double line spaced > > HTH > Tom Petch _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
