June 24 for both LCAF related and mobility sets? Fine with me. Dino
> On Oct 16, 2023, at 4:46 PM, Padma Pillay-Esnault <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Dino > > The groupings look good! > > Some dates look too aggressive Nov 2023: draft-ietf-lisp-geo, > draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding, RFC 8060 and 9306 (Standards Track). We are > already there ... > As the dates proposed are target dates, i suggest we keep the date of June > 2024 but if we can go faster it is all good. thoughts? > > Similar comment for mobility. > > Thanks > Padma > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 4:35 PM Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> wrote: > > What do you think of putting some major milestones for mobility and > > security sections rather than per document? > > I think security is further out compared to mobility. Just because other > groups will have to peer-review the security documents. But good suggestion > and will incldue below the set that go together (IMO). > > So here is what I suggest: > > For June 2024: Mobility documents as a set to IESG, which include: > > draft-ietf-lisp-eid-mobility, draft-ietf-lisp-mn, > draft-ietf-lisp-predictive-rlocs, draft-ietf-lisp-vpn > > And for June 2025: Security documents as a set to IESG, which include: > > draft-ietf-lisp-crypto (RFC8061 to Standards Track), > draft-ietf-lisp-ecdsa-auth, draft-ietf-lisp-eid-anonymity > > And then, not related to what you asked for, to put all LCAF related stuff in > one set: > > For Nov 2023: > > draft-ietf-lisp-geo, draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding, RFC 8060 and 9306 > (Standards Track) > > What do you think? > > Dino > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
