[lisp] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-te-24.txt

[Padma Pillay-Esnault]

Ack will add Padma On Jan 27, 2026, at 03:51, Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.i...@gmail.com> wrote:  Hi Padma, I may be missing something since I don't find section 7 to be multicast related - https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-lisp-te-24.html#section-7 The sole reference to RFC6831 currently is in section 8 but that is in the context of interworking where multicast reference is also provided. The main multicast consideration section is https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-lisp-te-24.html#section-9 where there is no reference to RFC6831 and that was the point that I was trying to make. So, yes an explicit reference in section 9 would be helpful. I also like Dino's suggestion to change the references to the bis versions (they are in WGLC and more importantly move those base specs to standards track). Thanks, Ketan On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 1:29 PM Dino Farinacci <farina...@gmail.com> wrote: > If you think it would improve clarity, we can certainly add an explicit cross-reference to RFC 6831 in a more visible way in section 8 as well. Make sure any references to 6831 and 8378 use 6831bis and 8378bis, respectively. Dino

_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list -- lisp@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to lisp-le...@ietf.org