On 2/24/99 3:29 PM, Rich Kulawiec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote...
>On Tue, Feb 23, 1999 at 09:48:24PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Is anyone else having problems with AOL subscribers?
>
>It's AOL's clueless (is this any surprise?) and inappropriate anti-spam
>tactics, which mostly seem to consist of blocking legitimate traffic
I'll back you up if you call their methods overzealous, but clueless and
inappropriate? Plenty of sites have no trouble. The ones that do, are the
ones playing fast and loose with DNS, have a bad history for allowing
relays, or are otherwise abusing SMTP delivery.
Yeah, AOL is much more restrictive of what it will accept, sometimes to a
fault. But they're only requiring that sites do things correctly.
--
Adam Bailey | Chicago, Illinois
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | "Logic is the art of going wrong with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | confidence." - George Bernard Shaw
Finger for PGP | http://www.lull.org/adam/
