When Rich Kulawiec wrote, K> I'm sorry, I don't see any reason to make allowances for people who K> are simultaneously (1) voluntarily signing up to receive large amounts K> of mail from one or more mailing lists and (2) failing to ensure that they K> have sufficient software tools and expertise to cope with (1). Mitch Collinsworth responded, C> So now you're against digests, too? It doesn't look that way to me. Taking a list in digest mode qualifies in my book as using a software tool to cope with having voluntarily signed up to receive large amounts of mail from that list. According to what Mitch quoted from Rich's post, Rich must be in favor of digests.
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject line Rich Kulawiec
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject ... Rich Kulawiec
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subj... Nick Simicich
- Re: Putting the listname on the... Rich Kulawiec
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subj... Rasmus Lerdorf
- Re: Putting the listname on the... Rich Kulawiec
- Re: Putting the listname on... Rasmus Lerdorf
- Re: Putting the listname on the... Nick Simicich
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject ... Mitch Collinsworth
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subj... Rich Kulawiec
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subj... David W. Tamkin
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject ... David W. Tamkin
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject line Nick Simicich
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject line SRE
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject line Russ Allbery
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject line Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject line Kenneth E. Bannister
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject line jet
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject line Keith Flippin
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject line David W. Tamkin
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject line Rich Kulawiec
