When I wrote,
T> In any case, she *certainly* should admit that she can't do anything about
T> the problem instead of lying to me that it is fixed.
Marc Haber suggested,
H> Maybe she was lied to by her administrator, which probably was no
H> genuine lie, but cluelessness on the adminitrator's part. It is
H> amazing how clueless some Exchange and/or Notes administrators are.
Very possible, Marc. After all, they were clueless enough to select such
software in the first place. Hey, if it can be told not to send back "mess-
age opened" in response to "message opened," can't it be told not to send it
back in response to blind carbons with low precedence? And of course reply-
ing "message opened" to all spam must be heaven for the tiny percentage of
spammers interested in verifying the validity of addresses.
It still boils downs to differences between Chuq's lists and mine and not to
differences between his personality and mine. When the incident revealed
what sort of email access she had, I was doing her a favor by ceasing to
jeopardize her job with unimportant personal email that she should not be
using company resources to receive.
