On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 01:30:26PM -0600, David W. Tamkin wrote: > Tim Pierce wrote, > > | I dream about the benefits that we could get from VERP delivery -- > | reduced CPU utilization, increased server efficiency, less listowner > | confusion, better word-of-mouth, and so on ... > > OK, I'll agree about less listowner confusion, and Russ Allbery has already > explained the reduced CPU utilization and the increased server efficiency in > his response when Bernie Cosell asked, but how do VERPs improve the word-of- > mouth? I would expect VERP-based delivery to be a big draw to potential list administrators. List managers are always exchanging gossip about which sites make it easiest to run a mailing list, and handling bounces are the biggest headache by far that the typical list admin has to deal with. Eliminating that hassle would be a feather in our cap for other list managers. -- Regards, Tim Pierce RootsWeb.com lead system admonsterator and Chief Hacking Officer
- Re: VERPs versus batched delivery Russ Allbery
- Re: VERPs versus batched delivery Tim Pierce
- Re: VERPs versus batched delivery Bernie Cosell
- Re: VERPs versus batched delivery Russ Allbery
- Re: VERPs versus batched delivery Vince Sabio
- Re: VERPs versus batched delivery John Levine
- Re: VERPs versus batched delivery Michelle Dick
- Re: VERPs versus batched delivery Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: VERPs versus batched delivery Nick Simicich
- Re: VERPs versus batched delivery David W. Tamkin
- Re: VERPs versus batched delivery Tim Pierce
- Re: VERPs versus batched delivery Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: VERPs versus batched delivery David W. Tamkin
- Re: VERPs versus batched delivery Michelle Dick
- Re: VERPs versus batched delivery Russ Allbery
- Re: VERPs versus batched delivery Joe Smith
- Re: VERPs versus batched delivery Roger Fajman
- Re: VERPs versus batched delivery Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: VERPs versus batched delivery mark david mcCreary
- Re: VERPs versus batched delivery Roger Fajman
- Re: VERPs versus batched delivery David W. Tamkin
