Re: interesting link on the AOL postmaster/abuse problem

[Roger B.A. Klorese]

On Sun, 9 Apr 2000, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
> Laurie turned my on to this today... FYI.
> 
> <http://www.samspade.org/noaol.html>

There are one or two bogus-to-me assumptions there, though.  

Bouncing mail addressed to abuse@ or postmaster@ would constitute
non-compliance (and remember, abuse@ is still a *draft* RFC).

Autoresponding with the appropriate addresses (as long as they in turn are
read) is compliant, though maybe not in the way you might prefer.

-- 
ROGER B.A. KLORESE     [EMAIL PROTECTED]     urgent: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PO Box 14309              San Francisco, CA 94114               +1 415 ALL-ARFF
"There is only one real blasphemy -- the refusal of joy!"       -- Paul Rudnick