Re: interesting link on the AOL postmaster/abuse problem

[Roger B.A. Klorese]

On Sun, 9 Apr 2000, Michael C. Berch wrote:
> The specific problem I had a week or so ago was that the autoresponder
> responded with, not an email address, but a pointer to a FAQ, and the
> FAQ (which had obviously not been updated) told people to send mail to
> the postmaster/abuse address.  Endless loop.  That is certainly noncompliant.

Agreed.

> The FAQ also made reference to telephoning the NOC in certain
> circumstances, and that would constitute compliance, to my thinking. 

> If this happens I wonder how long it will take for them to reinstitute a
> working mail address.  

Or disconnect their phones.
-- 
ROGER B.A. KLORESE     [EMAIL PROTECTED]     urgent: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PO Box 14309              San Francisco, CA 94114               +1 415 ALL-ARFF
"There is only one real blasphemy -- the refusal of joy!"       -- Paul Rudnick