Just another datapoint, but it applies.  Recently, a bunch of thread
responses on Slashdot (www.slashdot.org) were taken, and were going to be
put into a book.  There was such a hew and cry from the people that posted,
they decided NOT to publish the book, but make it in electronic format.

-=Bob

-----Original Message-----
From: Bernie Cosell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 3:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Netiquette: forwarding things to other forums


Dumb question time: I was e-chatting with a colleague and I mentioned 
that IMO it was impolite and improper to forward a person's postings 
in one forum to another forum without their knowledge and consent.  
He argued back, in essence, that "public is public", and it wasn't 
like he had divulged private correspondence or anything, and I should 
just chill out...

So I poked around a bit at a bunch of online netiquette resources and 
I was rather surprised NOT to find support for my position.  I still 
think it is reasonable and polite, but apparently the net-standards 
for behavior don't agree.  For example, RFC 1855 says...

    - If you are forwarding or re-posting a message you've received, do
      not change the wording.  If the message was a personal message to
      you and you are re-posting to a group, you should ask permission
      first...

And clearly by implication if it was *NOT* a personal message that 
asking permission is not necessary...

Am I off base here?  It seems that way ... [I'm a bit more disturbed 
than I ought to be about something relatively minor like this mostly 
because I've played this game for a LONG time now and it is always a 
bit unsettling to learn that something you took for granted not only 
wasn't "obvious" but might even be against-the-flow].

Also, it would have implications for the "copyright" crowd: if the 
long-standing internet standard is "public is public", then one would 
have a much weaker claim [if anyone actually dared to bring such a 
suit] to claim copyright restrictions in blocking further-propagation 
of postings to new/strange forums --- it would seem to be pefectly 
adequate to reply that the implied-license of sending a submission to 
a public list is broad, indeed].

  /Bernie\

-- 
Bernie Cosell                     Fantasy Farm Fibers
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]     Pearisburg, VA
    -->  Too many people, too few sheep  <--          

Reply via email to