On Sat, 9 Dec 2000, J C Lawrence wrote: > The second is a horrible nasty problem in this age of mail > forgery and the ease of harvesting member addresses from > lists (especially once you are a subscriber). Given that a > spammer can susbcribe and can then harvest addresses with > (presumably) posting authority with no more than a couple > hours worth of scripting and a little time waiting while his > bot runs, the simple MESSAGE_FROM_XXX_IS_OKAY metric is > likely to last no longer. Lyris has a optional feature that requires a subscriber password for posting. The subscriber includes their personal list password at the start of the body of the post. This password is stripped before the post is distributed.... I think I'd just switch to full moderation before I tried this technique. - murr -
- Is mailback validation still safe? Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? James M Galvin
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? murr rhame
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? J C Lawrence
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? J C Lawrence
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? murr rhame
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? murr rhame
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Mike Nolan
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? John R Levine
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? murr rhame
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Michael C. Berch
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Tim Pierce
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? murr rhame
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Paul Hoffman / IMC
