On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 07:13:37PM -0500, murr rhame wrote: > In my humble opinion, the primary purpose of mailback validation > to prevent someone from being subscribed to a mailing list > against their will (email bombing). That's my take on it as well. To the extent that it also discourages spammers from trying to harvest mail coming off of lists, that's nice but is hardly the goal. -- Regards, Tim Pierce RootsWeb.com lead system admonsterator and Chief Hacking Officer
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? James M Galvin
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? murr rhame
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? J C Lawrence
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? J C Lawrence
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? murr rhame
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? murr rhame
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Mike Nolan
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? John R Levine
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? murr rhame
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Michael C. Berch
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Tim Pierce
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? murr rhame
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Tim Pierce
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Tim Pierce
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? SRE
- Re: Is mailback validation still safe? Mike Nolan
