> From: J C Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> I find myself retroactively interested in this thread.  The tone of
> one of my lists has begun to suffer becoming somewhat caustic and
> aggressive, far from the professional slightly chummy yet formal
> attitude it had (and I took so long building).  

Based on your description, it sounds like both you and the other person
both have some degree of conflict of interest with the list itself.

Is your community commenting on (and objecting to) the change in tone or 
is it just you?  And if the latter, are you sure it isn't because of 
your other venture?

No offense intended, but without more details or lurking on the list,
it might be difficult to offer a more precise evaluation.

On one of my own lists, we have had an evolution over time.  Some of our
better (and more technically competent) posters have gotten tired of
having their expertise questioned and moved on to other venues for the
subject.  And in many cases, it wasn't intended to be criticism, it was
just a free-flowing discussion in which assumptions were not always the
same.  To use a simplified example, if every time a poster writes 'The car 
is blue', someone questions whether their definition of blue is the same 
as someone else's, after a while the first poster gets tired of it.
--
Mike Nolan

Reply via email to