Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
> 
> > But tying it to a legitimate system rations the stamps, since the only way
> > to get them is through the legitmate system, who would presumably turn
> > down a request for 10,000,000 stamps from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Why would you? How do you define limits? And legitimate use?
> 
> What about mail lists? Who's stamp is used? Because if it's the list-owner,
> hack3rd00d might well have a legitimate need for that, just not a corporate
> need. Are we now limiting high-volume to only corporations?

That would be the corperate fashist authoritarian solution, and this
is not said as a troll or flame.
> 
> --
> Chuq Von Rospach, Architech
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.chuqui.com/
> 
> Someday, we'll look back on this, laugh
> nervously and change the subject.

-- 
 
end
            Respectfully,
                         Kirk D Bailey


+---------------------"Thou Art Free." -Eris----------------------+
| http://www.howlermonkey.net mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| http://www.tinylist.org  +--------+  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
+------------------Thinking| NORMAL |Thinking---------------------+
                           +--------+

Reply via email to