Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
>
> > But tying it to a legitimate system rations the stamps, since the only way
> > to get them is through the legitmate system, who would presumably turn
> > down a request for 10,000,000 stamps from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Why would you? How do you define limits? And legitimate use?
>
> What about mail lists? Who's stamp is used? Because if it's the list-owner,
> hack3rd00d might well have a legitimate need for that, just not a corporate
> need. Are we now limiting high-volume to only corporations?
That would be the corperate fashist authoritarian solution, and this
is not said as a troll or flame.
>
> --
> Chuq Von Rospach, Architech
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.chuqui.com/
>
> Someday, we'll look back on this, laugh
> nervously and change the subject.
--
end
Respectfully,
Kirk D Bailey
+---------------------"Thou Art Free." -Eris----------------------+
| http://www.howlermonkey.net mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| http://www.tinylist.org +--------+ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
+------------------Thinking| NORMAL |Thinking---------------------+
+--------+