On Sun, 19 May 2002 21:50:29 -0700 Chuq Von Rospach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As an extreme example -- if a person wants a "proof of license" to > send child pornography, it's going to be rejected by any > authority. But on a fundamental basis, if you want to avoid censorship > or bureaucratic biases of any sort, if the recipient of that e-mail > WANTS the kiddie porn, that license should be granted. To do otherwise > simply creates a system where you no longer have "send it only if I > accept it" but a bureaucracy of some sort that defines "send it only > if it's acceptable". Its also worth noting that the legal and political temptation and rewards to turn the former into the latter effectively guarantee that it will be. -- J C Lawrence ---------(*) Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas. [EMAIL PROTECTED] He lived as a devil, eh? http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live.
