On 5/21/02 10:00 PM, "J C Lawrence" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This problem is implicit in SPAM being defined behaviourally. People > don't have universal views on behaviour. They don't have universal views on spam, either. Get 10 people together, and you'll get 11 definitions of what it is. Unfortunately, too often, it boils down to "the stuff I don't want to see", which is another reason why draining this swamp is so nasty. Everyone wants spam killed -- but nobody agrees on what it is, except in very general ways that leave nobody really satisfied. -- Chuq Von Rospach, Architech [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.chuqui.com/ Yes, I am an agent of Satan, but my duties are largely ceremonial.
