Nick gave the example, | > Reply-to: listname@listdomain, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JCL commented, | Having [mutiple addresses in] Reply-To is a Good ... and Damned Useful [Thing]. It seems to me, though, that the list membership would be better served with this form: Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] because the MUAs with which I'm familiar make it anywhere from slightly easier to far easier for the respondent to remove addresses from the right of the reply's To: than from the left.
