On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 21:50:29 -0400 Nick Simicich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 04:28 PM 2002-07-16 -0700, J C Lawrence wrote: >> Rephrased the way I actually meant: >> Having multiple addresses in Reply-To is a Good Thing and Damned >> Useful.
> And AOL will throw your mail on the floor if the mail seems to come > from an AOL user and is going back to AOL, or at least that is what we > seem to have discovered. <nod> In the general case, at least for Mailman, this won't be a problem as Mailman will only collect addresses in Reply-To if there's an address in Reply-To already. What it won't do is create a new Reply-To when there wasn't one before, and then populate it with multiple addresses. > I wonder if this is an issue where they presume that AOL users can't > set reply-to, so any mail with a reply-to inside of AOL must be > forged? Quite possibly. -- J C Lawrence ---------(*) Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas. [EMAIL PROTECTED] He lived as a devil, eh? http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live.
