Norbert Bollow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually I believe that such a responsibility exists only where > the list-owners want the situation to be different from the default > that is implied by copyright law, namely:
OMIGOD, you still believe in the copyright law? :-) > I support the idea of creating an RFC about a simple and yet > sufficiently powerful and machine-parseable format for communicating > whatever rules the list-owner wants to be applicable to any given > list. That's an excellent idea, I can think of a variety of rules that could be promulgated that way, not just archiving policies. Let's do it! -- Mike Nolan
