Nick Simicich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If it in necessary to write an RFC,
Whether necessary or not, a document will get written, and I'll try to get it accepted as a standards-track RFC. > it should explicitly say, "By the way, > it is not acceptable for you to grab messages and archive them unless you > get permission." I agree with the sentiment, but this isn't exactly the language that I'd use in a RFC. :-) I'd rather put something like: """ In particular, if nothing is explicitly specified, then that MUST be interpreted as equivalent to the following: List-ArchivePolicy: 1 (ask: permission from the list-owner is needed) List-GatewayPolicy: 1 (ask: permission from the list-owner is needed) List-RobotPolicy: 1 (ask: permission from the list-owner is needed) """ Are there any objections against this language? Greetings, Norbert. -- Founder & Steering Committee member of http://gnu.org/projects/dotgnu/ Norbert Bollow, Weidlistr.18, CH-8624 Gruet (near Zurich, Switzerland) Tel +41 1 972 20 59 Fax +41 1 972 20 69 http://norbert.ch List hosting with GNU Mailman on your own domain name http://cisto.com
