...But the older I get, the less certain things seem to make sense. We all make 
certain assumptions about things. Recently, I came up with a question I just 
couldn't answer, not even with my assumptions. 
   
  This is the part where I get sentimental. 
   
  I finally took to task the question of whether dance permits are actually 
legal. Now some of you have moved on to bigger and better questions, but I 
don't think I can really do that until I can understand what the status is, and 
why. 
   
  My assumptions were "of course they're legal, otherwise they wouldn't be 
law." But on what grounds are they legal? Questions of constitutionality came 
to my mind, and I simply am not able to answer them. Not questions of 
constitutionality based upon their wording, but because of the actual practice 
of requiring permits. Maybe some of you can answer a couple of these questions. 
 
   
  1. It is my understanding that government can limit individual rights so long 
as "a legitimate state interest" exists. To that, I ask "What is the compelling 
interest to require that people have permission from their local government to 
dance?" What is it that seperates dancing from other self-expression such as 
participating in a protest, writing, or perhaps laughing during a movie, that 
do not require permission? 
   
  2. Free expression: This is not expressly written in the constitution but 
respected none-the-less as inherent in the 1st amendment. Does it apply to 
recreational activities (playing ball in the park, for example), that have no 
inherent victim or other harm (drugs, fighting) to society?   
   
  3. Do dance permits set a precedent for requiring permits for other 
recreational activities such as painting? Keep in mind here, I'm referring to 
situations --inside of a privately owned building-- with the owner's consent 
and no victim or harm to society. 
   
  The answers to these seem like they would be simple, but to me they simply 
are not. Via dancing and music and venues which allow us to do this, we've all 
been able to self-express in some form or another. What is the justification to 
require permission to dance as a form of self-expression, and outright forbid 
it in certain forms? (after 2 a.m., in groups, etc) Without a justification, 
would dance permits be unconstitutional? 
   
   
  Just thoughts. 

                
---------------------------------
Get your email and more, right on the  new Yahoo.com 
___________________________________________________________________
The DJ Denise mailing list           http://www.djdenise.com/

Reply via email to