>It might even be worth expanding bless to form permanent links between >namespaces, making a variable (or branch) common to both. I'm not sure if >you'd want to allow it to link in an entire namespace or not.
Please be careful, as you discuss this stuff, not to burden existing commands with functionality that they weren't built to carry. In this circumstance, a new command should be created to form permanent links between namespaces. /BLESS is only used to link an otherwise asynchronous atomic scope to the local variables of an enclosing, /WAITing scope that appears to be "lexically" visible, but otherwise is not. I'd rather not ever change that without a really good reason... Jeremy _______________________________________________ List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://epicsol.org/mailman/listinfo/list
