On Wed Mar 10, 2004; 03:12PM -0500 Dave Kratter propagated the following:
> I think OTHER works.
> 
> On a related issue...
> 
> I would like to request that the WALLOPS level be split into two levels: one for 
> server WALLOPS and one 
> for server operator WALLOPS (or OPERWALLs). The purpose of the two different types 
> of WALLOPS is clearly 
> different, one being for server notices of various kinds and the other being for 
> server operator 
> communications. I think the two should therefore be treated differently by the 
> client, rather than 
> forcing a script to work around it.
> 

Operwalls are delineated only by a prefix in the WALLOPS message (when sent
to users).  In fact it would be trivial to fake an operwall by simply
applying this prefix to a standard wallops message.  The client has no way
of determining if this is really an operwall or not, a script is better
suited to this.  It would be better if scripts could simply create their
own log levels (beyond just USER1-USER4, levels with their own names etc).

> 
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 04:04:15PM -0600, Jeremy Nelson wrote:
> > So my proposal is when you do things like /window level you'll get
> > 
> > *** Window level is OTHER PUBLIC MSGS NOTICES WALLS WALLOPS NOTES OPNOTES
> > +SNOTES ACTIONS CTCP USERLOG1 USERLOG2 USERLOG3 USERLOG4
> > 
> > instead of
> > 
> > *** Window level is CRAP PUBLIC MSGS NOTICES WALLS WALLOPS NOTES OPNOTES
> > +SNOTES ACTIONS CTCP USERLOG1 USERLOG2 USERLOG3 USERLOG4
> > 
> > but you can still do /window level crap and it'll be supported for backwards
> > compatability.  It'll just show up as "other" on output.
> > 
> > Objections?
> > Jeremy
> 
> -- 
> 
> BlackJac
> Foxlink EFNet Server Operator
> _______________________________________________
> List mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://epicsol.org/mailman/listinfo/list
-chip
--
personal: chip norkus; renaissance hacker;        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
work:     systems engineer @ lunarpages, inc.;    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
info:     finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for plan or keys;  http://telekinesis.org
_______________________________________________
List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://epicsol.org/mailman/listinfo/list

Reply via email to