On 1/11/06, Dr. Core <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
MS in engines... like the workers in Titanic's? :-)
I thought GC ships were planned as just a display case for the GC series until this Musai comes out. Now it's a playset.
The EX looks exactly like this GC, only without all the gadgets. Also has the Char-head version bridge.
That's the first thing come to my mind too.
Boaz MyTurnASpace wrote:
> Hobbysearch got its pic up. Seems like there's another implementation of the
> MS position inside the Musai ship (and different from Mark's
> interpretation), with 2 zaku stacked in the back of the ship, one right in
Ok I want to respond BEFORE I look at the pix my self. I love the GC
model line, but on a matter of priniciple, you can't take any feature
out of the GC implementations seriously. The GC WB mix and match very
accurate features (MS launchpads) with highly dubious ones (MS storage
in the main engines).
MS in engines... like the workers in Titanic's? :-)
I thought GC ships were planned as just a display case for the GC series until this Musai comes out. Now it's a playset.
> model... figure that's now the new standard for Musai just as the MG Zaku
> for all Zaku since.
For the same reason, I won't take it too seriously that GC look
duplicates the EX look. The EX was explicitly an MS Igloo version
(right?), and GC is still shaking its toy mantra to be treated as
standard setter.
The EX looks exactly like this GC, only without all the gadgets. Also has the Char-head version bridge.
With that out of the way... let me look...
Oooh it looks nice. And the MS storage looks sort of reasonable...
But it won't look right next to the GC WB, which looks very 1979.
That's the first thing come to my mind too.
--
Boaz
http://myturnaspace.blogspot.com
