Re: [RE][gundam] (OT) Mod Chips

[Joseph Riggs]

I dunno...   "Your honor, the plaintiff is only filing because he wants the law overturned!  I demand that this suit to which I am not a direct party be thrown out of court!"   ^^;;   So long as the plaintiff's lawyers actually argued their case in a competent manner (i.e. tried to win to the best of their ability), I don't think that there would be a legal issue.   The reason I mentioned the Scopes case is because it's the best known case created along these lines.  From what I've heard, everyone involved with both the plaintiffs and the defense (including apparently even William Jennings Bryan) was pretty confident that the case would get the law overturned, but that didn't stop either side from arguing the case to the best of their ability.     junior ---------[ Received Mail Content ]---------- Subject : Re: [RE][gundam] (OT) Mod Chips Date : Wed, 16 May 2007 18:04:04 -0400 From : "Dr. Core" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To : list@gundam.com Joseph Riggs wrote: > The trick is to get a plaintiff who's "in on the deal", so to speak, and willing to push the > thing through as far as the courts will let it go. There should be at least a few non-profits Hahaha very devious. But I don't think it would work, I will ask my lawyer colleague. I suspect there's some serious punishment for plaintiffs who bring suits with a hidden agenda/motive. Just a guess, based on from what I heard, one of ACLU's problems is finding real life plaintiffs/defendants who won't chicken out.

---

Love Games? Gamesville is Waiting for You...
Free Online Games, Fat Cash $ Prizes
Plus Bingo, Solitaire, Poker & Much More!
http://www.gamesville.com

-------------------------------------------------- The Gundam Mailing List MK-II list@gundam.com Archives: http://www.gundam.com/gml Help: Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with this in the BODY: help list