I picked up the 1/144 HG Exia and loved it. I decided to get the 1/60 because I like the design a lot and wanted a bigber kit of it. I am holding off on the 1/100 because I think a MG will come eventually. I like the Virtue too. I am wondering if the hair will be removable or if it fits under the armor. I am also curious if the Virtue armor can actually go on the HCM-PRO Nadleeh. From the pictures it comes with two bodies. The one is obviously used to wear the virtue armor but is it just so you can pose the Virtue and the Nadleeh together or because the nadleeh can't wear the Virtue armor?
________________________________ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Richard Ramos Sent: Fri 2/15/2008 6:32 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [gundam] MotM Jan-Mar 08 in my case, I've completed the 1/144 line of 00 (so far, up to the Graham Flag), and what I can say is that the designs grew on me. of the four, I actually like the clunky feel of the Virtue, which has translated well into model kit mode - it's so good, in fact, that I have now reserved the 1/100 kit, just to get the Nadleeh. I'm also getting the 1/100 dynames but am not getting the Kyrios or the Exia in 1/100 - sorry, but from the kit manuals, they're just bigger versions of the same construction and design - nothing much new, unless you count the 1/100 Exia having beam sabers for all four beam hilts - that's not a good enough reason for me to throw away money. Also, am convinced of add-ons, since the Kyrios has two "mystery" polycaps hidden by armor plate in the back legs - at the exact spot where one would need support pegs for that large bomb/rocket pack it carries at times. another is that both the Astraea add-on parts and the DYnames calves have these slots to mount the DYnames pistol packs. I'm expecting a lot from Dengeki and other mags for these extra goodies. It's either that, or we'll have ver.2 kits, much like the Gundam X kits. Speaking of the GN Arms - I feel that it's the bastard child of the G-Falcon and the G-Defensor. I'd not be surprised if it is used by the Kyrios while in flight mode (which would make the kyrios look like a Strike Valkyrie on steroids). On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Reynolds, Jason M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The Zaku II Version 2 is a very good kit. It is a noticeable improvement on the original and is an improvement over the Katoki Zaku II's they released for the 0083 MG Line. Are there any specifics you could mention that ended up turning you off to the Flag and Tieren? -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dr. Core Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 12:33 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [gundam] MotM Jan-Mar 08 Reynolds, Jason M. wrote: > Don't forget that they are also releasing a Zaku II F ver. 2. I can't When I said 'first "new" MG', I wasn't counting (as always) minor variations and (esp.) recolors including metallics. Actually the one that I really forgot is the Unicorn. > only real change the leg thrusters? If so then they are really bending > people over to charge them for a whole new kit that could've been I take the opposite angle, Zaku 2.0 must be a really kick-ass model if they are cranking out so many minor variants and recolors in such a short time (or they must be really stupid). > I actually love almost all of the Gundam 00 MS designs. The only one The Flags and Tierens looked good at a glance, when I have time to scrutinize the details, especially from Gundam Base.Side 1 and Gunplablog, I invariably ended up hating them. -- Dr. Core -------------------------------------------------- The Gundam Mailing List MK-II [email protected] Archives: http://www.gundam.com/gml Help: Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with this in the BODY: help list -------------------------------------------------- The Gundam Mailing List MK-II [email protected] Archives: http://www.gundam.com/gml Help: Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with this in the BODY: help list
<<winmail.dat>>
