At 05:32 PM 1/3/99 -0500, Mikki Barry wrote: >This argument does not follow. I would argue that intellectual property >protection and interests are beyond the scope of ICANN completely. Right. We have courts for that. -- "To find out what your opponent is up to, look at what he says about you" - unknown __________________________________________________ To receive the digest version instead, send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___END____________________________________________
- [ifwp] Re: How not to define membership classes Christopher Ambler
- [ifwp] Re: How not to define membership classes BrandonButterworth
- [ifwp] Re: How not to define membership classes jeff Williams
- [ifwp] Re: How not to define membership classes Kent Crispin
- [ifwp] Re: How not to define membership classes Mikki Barry
- [ifwp] Re: How not to define membership classes Kent Crispin
- [ifwp] Re: How not to define membership classes steve
- [ifwp] Re: How not to define membership classes Milton Mueller
- [ifwp] Re: How not to define membership classes Roberto Gaetano
- [ifwp] Re: How not to define membership classes Mikki Barry
- [ifwp] Re: How not to define membership classes Richard J. Sexton
- [ifwp] Re: How not to define membership classes Kent Crispin
- [ifwp] Re: How not to define membership classes Milton Mueller
- [ifwp] Re: How not to define membership classes Michael Sondow
- [ifwp] Re: How not to define membership classes Michael Sondow
- [ifwp] Re: How not to define membership classes William X. Walsh
- [ifwp] Re: How not to define membership classes Gordon Cook
- [ifwp] Re: How not to define membership classes Richard J. Sexton
- [ifwp] Re: How not to define membership classes Michael Sondow
- [ifwp] Re: How not to define membership classes Kent Crispin
- [ifwp] Re: How not to define membership classes Dave Crocker
