At 09:16 PM 1/3/99 -0500, you wrote:
>Richard J. Sexton a �crit:
>> 
>> At 05:32 PM 1/3/99 -0500, Mikki Barry wrote:
>> >This argument does not follow.  I would argue that intellectual property
>> >protection and interests are beyond the scope of ICANN completely.
>> 
>> Right. We have courts for that.
>
>That argument won't stand up. They can argue successfully, I believe, that
>prevention of the problem, on the level of domain name registration, is the
>only way to solve it because the courts will be too overburdened otherwise,
>and because the expense of trying all the cases will be too great.

Thats for a judge to decide.

Onerous a priori restrictions on domain registrations wouls be
a nasty precedent.

Anybody rememeber how the VCR was going to kill the movie industry
and the exact oposite happened ?

--
"To find out what your opponent is up to, look at what he
says about you" - unknown



__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________

Reply via email to