Taft and all,
Well Taft, what can be done is to register an official contest to the
contract that the ICANN is entering into with the NIST, would be one step,
all be a temporary one. Another step would be to get a petition up to send
to the NTIA protesting the thus far actions that the ICANN is taking
and considering taking based on their current public statements.
What do you think of these for starters? >;) There is much more that
could also be done, but they would be much more drastic and of a
legal nature of course. Joint class action anyone?
Taft Charles Frederick wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jan 1999, Jim Dixon wrote:
>
> > This is indeed the best outcome. However, imagine that ICANN were
> > to gain operational control of the root name servers, and then send
> > out a directive requiring all ccTLDs to adopt certain policies, with
> > a clear warning that any registries not complying would have their
> > ccTLDs handed over to someone else. In this scenario, in which
> > ICANN attempts to actually become the Grand Regulator, there would
> > be something hitting the fan.
> >
> > --
>
> Agreed. But what else can you do?
>
> -----------------------
> Taft Charles Frederick
> Chief Executive Officer
> 2AF Engineering, Ltd.
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
