Adam and all,
I wouldn't pay allot of attention to William lately. He was kicked out of the
.TJ NOC and is under some scrutiny for embezzling some funds from
them. SO it is understandable that he would be in his personal
attack mode.
Adam Todd Snr wrote:
> At 23:49 19/01/99 -0800, William X. Walsh wrote:
> >On 19-Jan-99 Adam Todd Snr wrote:
> >>
> >alternative efforts have lacked credibility, you are delusional Adam.
>
> Well done. Certainly proves my point.
>
> Not much has changed and the personal attacks and slanging matches continue
> as always! Now I can just imagine a board meeting. I think I saw it on
> ABC TV last week - it was called the Australian Parliamentary Broadcast.
>
> >Well, from some research tonight, I see one thing you haven't been doing.
> >Working on the quality of your alternative root-server network. For example,
> >the root hints files you generate for the world outside AU to configure with
> >contains incorrect IPs for your supposed EU root-servers.
>
> It does? I must admit I haven't checked of late. I've been a little busy
> protecting my baby boy from the evil villlian kidanppers of the world.
>
> Although I'm sure when I last checked the files were up to date. Perhaps
> it's a cached copy or a copy I've overlooked tucked away somewhere (in
> whcih case I appologise, but no one has raised this with me.) Can you tell
> me where the files were that you looked at. I'll make sure they are correct.
>
> >I've gone over the inaccuracies of you zones before, and I won't rehash them
> >here, except to say that I notice you fixed the ones I posted about before.
>
> There you go. A report made is a problem fixed. And I thanked you for
> pointing out the concerns. I'll always fix things that aren't right - if
> they are brought to my attention.
>
> >Let's see if you can find the ones I didn't post that still have bad data.
>
> Feel free to post them to me. Can't fix what I don't know is broke and I'm
> not responsible for the worlds data accuracy, only what is submitted to me.
>
> >> Oh - I'd post it but the 97K report won't go through the list :(
> >>
> >
> >Post it to me privatly, and I'll see if it can be independantly verified.
>
> Sure, when I get a few moments, I'll do that. But for the next two days I
> have to sort out a matter where some adult male has been putting his doddle
> in a 5 year old girls bottom. Has a slightly higher priority that worrying
> about whether you can independantly verify server usage. Don't you think?
>
> >You prior claims never stood up to independant verification in the past, so I
> >doubt you will provide verifiable data.
>
> I've never seen any independant verification done on any of the preious
> listings I've provided. Have they been posted? When and where?
>
> >But if you can, I'd be happy to post a retraction.
>
> Retraction? Such a strong word. How about "a cooperation."
>
> :)
>
> >In particular the wannabes playing with alternative root-server dns networks.
>
> Hardly a wannabe. It's real :) It's still there isn't it!
>
> --
> DOMAIN-POLICY administrivia should be sent to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To unsubscribe send a message with only one line "SIGNOFF DOMAIN-POLICY"
> For more help regarding Listserv commands send the one line "HELP"
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
