I guess I would have to ask, "is this really the point"?
I am a Trademark
Holder and paten holder, yet I do NOT agree with the intent
or verbiage
of the WIPO report, not to mention it overstepped its mandate in the
White Paper. Many companies that I have personally talked to
their
management agree with me on this as well, yet WIPO is espousing
differently. So, William's point is well taken, in that the Trademark
community
is NOT unified behind WIPO, and therefore has not more "STAKE"
than
anyone or any company/organization, and it shouldn't, neither should
any Trademark owner. And THIS IS the point!
Jay Fenello wrote:
At 1/25/99, 08:20 PM, William X. Walsh wrote:Regards,
>
>On 26-Jan-99 Jay Fenello wrote:
>> Hi William,
>>
>> They have the influence they have,
>> and that's enough influence to block
>> *any* proposal put on the table.
>
>People keep claiming this, but I fail to see exactly how they can claim to be
>able to do this?
>
>Especially considering that they have been unable to use that influence to get
>their rules adopted at legislative levels.
>
>Why are we operating under this assumption?Think of it this way.
The trademark/business community is *much*,
**much** stronger than ORSC, yet ORSC has
been able to block (or at least slow down)
many of the plans that we haven't agreed
with.Don't you think they can as well?
Jay.
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
