Jim Dixon wrote:
> "Us" includes me, Bob.  I don't think that these end user groups
> should so casually claim to represent the users of the Internet.
> You and I are both users.  Does Michael Sandow represent you?
> Does the CR-CL represent me?  I think not.

 Neither Michael's group nor the illusory CR-CL
 represent either you or me apparently. That begs
 a question: which organization represent us as
 individuals? No comers? Well my answer is clear.
 no organization. We may have our careers and
 interests. Which change over time of course.
 But as people we have no refuge, no place.
 Unless it is this forum. Which I believe can
 serve as such a space in  my opinion. 

 The world is so vastly complex and individuals
 making it up so differant that it will be 
 virtually impossible to make one supporting
 organization for "us" let alone a half dozen 
 attempting to encompass all of the various
 interests we may also have. I fall back to
 Auerbach's oft repeated idea: there is no way 
 any Supporting Organization structure will
 in any way work. It is impossible for one
 group, let alone six to gather all the
 strands together.

 Which leaves us with a forum that allows all
 strands to co-exist. Which deals *ONLY* with
 individuals as individuals. This is such a 
 forum. The IFWP must be re-energized. Indeed
 we must rewrite our own White Paper here and
 now and begin where August and all of this
 ICANN craziness left us off. Enough of the
 manufactured confusion! LEt us call off the
 phoney war and put an end to all of this 
 damned secrecy andpower globe-trotting!

 We have the assembly and we have it here.

 Bob Allisat

 Free Community Network _ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://fcn.net _ http://fcn.net/allisat
 http://robin.fcn.net

Reply via email to