vinton g. cerf a �crit: > > michael, i don't believe the proposal does what you claim it does. The CORE/INTA proposal creates constituencies in such a way (separate constituencies) that businesses and their lawyers will have enough votes (6 out of eighteen) to unduly influence, even control, the Names Council. And the same goes for the nominating committee for candidates to serve on the Board of ICANN. This is what the INTA has been angling for in the drafting of the DNSO.org proposal, and at the Washington meeting, where they went so far as to ask for the Names Council to determine policy without the involvement or approval of the DNSO membership. Surely ISOC, with its guiding principles of open evolution and fairness, can't be in agreement with these special-interest manipulations of the DNSO.
