>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Sun, 7 Feb 1999 22:07:50 -0500 (EST) >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Non-member submission from [Don Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] >To: Michael Sondow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], > [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], > [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], > [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], > [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], > [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], > [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], > [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], > [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From: Don Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: ISOC support for CORE/INTA Domain Name Support > Organization: Principles or Expediency? >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Mime-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > >At 05:36 PM 2/7/99 -0500, Michael Sondow wrote: >>In your opinion, is it in keeping with ISOC's guiding principle of assuring >>"the beneficial, open evolution of the global Internet" to create a Domain >>Name Support Organization of ICANN that gives control of the domain space to >>the trademarks lobby and the big businesses they represent? If not, why do >>you permit ISOC's name to be used in support of the CORE/INTA DNSO >>application? > >Michael > >No matter how hard you may try to cast the consensus proposal supported >by ISOC as giving "control of the domain space to the trademarks lobby >and the big businesses they represent," in the end the reality of the >consensus proposal won't change. It is a very good proposal that was >hammered out in an open process where many compromises were made in >order to get the broadest consensus. The proposal most certainly has >not given control to any specific group. > >I assure you that that process is still open to all who would be willing >to honestly work for a still broader consensus resolution. > >The group with a consistent narrow focus, the small collection of >people driven by those claiming to be part of ORSC, seems to be quite >unwilling to work with anyone but themselves. Why? If they are >truly interested in consensus, I would think they would seriously >be interested in working with a much broader spectrum of people. > >Don > -- The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws. [EMAIL PROTECTED] "It's all just marketing" +1 (613) 473-1719 Maitland House, Bannockburn, Ontario, CANADA, K0K 1Y0
