[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kerry Miller) wrote:
>But it also leads me to wonder if we have been too literal in
>construing the *third level namespace. Is there a functional problem
>if www.nma.com was one ownership, and xxx.nma.com was
>another? (Each one of course could register whatever space they
>needed for their own network, but really, would such a list be bigger
>than *two* characters could deal with?)
The technology supports this. It is actually often used this way,
among suborganizations of an organization. In this case, the
organizations sharing nma.com would have to agree on appropriate
policies for sharing responsibility for maintaining their respective
namespaces.
--gregbo
