At 03:07 PM 2/10/99 -0800, Greg Skinner wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kerry Miller) wrote:
>
>>But it also leads me to wonder if we have been too literal in
>>construing the *third level namespace. Is there a functional problem
>>if www.nma.com was one ownership, and xxx.nma.com was
>>another? (Each one of course could register whatever space they
>>needed for their own network, but really, would such a list be bigger
>>than *two* characters could deal with?)
>
>The technology supports this. It is actually often used this way,
>among suborganizations of an organization. In this case, the
>organizations sharing nma.com would have to agree on appropriate
>policies for sharing responsibility for maintaining their respective
>namespaces.
Not quite. Look at the headers of this message. MHSC.COM uses four level
sub-domains. The domain admin determines the architecture of the
sub-domains. MHSC.NET goes down to five-level domains, with a completely
different architecture.
___________________________________________________
Roeland M.J. Meyer -
e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet phone: hawk.lvrmr.mhsc.com
Personal web pages: http://staff.mhsc.com/~rmeyer
Company web-site: http://www.mhsc.com
___________________________________________________
KISS ... gotta love it!