At 03:07 PM 2/10/99 -0800, Greg Skinner wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kerry  Miller) wrote:
>
>>But it also leads me to wonder if we have been too literal in 
>>construing the *third level namespace. Is there a functional problem 
>>if  www.nma.com was one ownership, and xxx.nma.com was 
>>another?  (Each one of course could register whatever space they 
>>needed for their own network, but really, would such a list be bigger 
>>than *two* characters could deal with?)
>
>The technology supports this.  It is actually often used this way,
>among suborganizations of an organization.  In this case, the
>organizations sharing nma.com would have to agree on appropriate
>policies for sharing responsibility for maintaining their respective
>namespaces.

Not quite. Look at the headers of this message. MHSC.COM uses four level
sub-domains. The domain admin determines the architecture of the
sub-domains. MHSC.NET goes down to five-level domains, with a completely
different architecture. 
___________________________________________________ 
Roeland M.J. Meyer - 
e-mail:                                      mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet phone:                                hawk.lvrmr.mhsc.com
Personal web pages:             http://staff.mhsc.com/~rmeyer
Company web-site:                           http://www.mhsc.com
___________________________________________________ 
                       KISS ... gotta love it!

Reply via email to