>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 00:07:35 -0500 (EST)
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Non-member submission from [Jonathan
Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
>
>>From msen.com!weinberg Sun Feb 14 00:07:34 1999
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Received: from mail.msen.com(conch.msen.com[148.59.19.5]) (1794 bytes) by
ns1.vrx.net
> via sendmail with P:smtp/D:aliases/T:pipe
> (sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
> id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 14 Feb 1999 00:07:34 -0500 (EST)
> (Smail-3.2.0.100 1997-Dec-8 #2 built 1997-Dec-18)
>Received: from jon (ana-mi8-14.ix.netcom.com [199.183.211.238])
> by mail.msen.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id AAA01271
> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 14 Feb 1999 00:06:36 -0500 (EST)
>Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.3 (32)
>Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 00:02:14 -0500
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: Jonathan Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: drj response to Kent -- long
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Supporters of the Paris draft have stressed that the Paris draft seeks to
>ensure that any proposals forwarded by the DNSO "represent a true consensus
>of the interested community" (David's words); they criticize the BMW draft
>for allowing recommendations to go forward without such consensus. A bunch
>of folks supporting the Paris draft also enthusiastically support the
>addition of a bunch of new gTLDs to the ICANN-recognized root servers. It
>seems to me that there's something of a tension there. I don't expect
>consensus on the issue of new gTLDs anytime soon. I wouldn't expect ICANN
>to move forward on adding new gTLDs until getting such a recommendation
>from the DNSO. And the more the DNSO structure requires, before it can
>forward a recommendation, that there be consensus between the
>lots-of-new-gTLDs camp and the
>no-new-gTLDs-or-at-the-very-least-add-them-as-slowly-as-possible camp, the
>longer it's going to be (it seems to me) before we actually see any
>significant number of new gTLDs. Am I missing something?
>
>Jon
>
>
>Jonathan Weinberg
>Associate Professor of Law
>Wayne State University
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "It's all just marketing" +1 (613) 473-1719
Maitland House, Bannockburn, Ontario, CANADA, K0K 1Y0
