Hi Ken -- Your questrions need some additonal context before the
answers can make any sense..
Are we talking about registrars for only registries that are monoplies
like NSI, or totally shared registeries ala CORE, or all registries
including all ccTLDs and new gTLDs?
Will all TLD registries be required to operate as shared registries
the same way that NSI is required, or the way POC/PAB/CORE plans to
operate shared registries?
Are you going to propote one size fits all for all rgions, segments
and nations?
If not, what do you have in mind?
>From your message Mon, 15 Feb 1999 16:56:41 -0500:
}
}
}-----Original Message-----
}From: Jay Fenello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
}To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
}Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Becky Burr
}<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
}<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
}<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
}<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Esther Dyson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mike Roberts
}<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
}Date: Monday, February 15, 1999 1:41 PM
}Subject: Re: [IFWP] Re: Central Authority is be Dangerous
}
}
}hello jay:
}
}i would appreciate some further elightenment in light of your comments
}below:
}
}1.who do you believe has the "rights" to access to the IP data ? what is
}your definition of "IPdata" ?
}2.who do believe should be accrediting registrars and the development of
}mechanisms to insure that they operate in "the best interest of the
}internet" ?
Who indeed Ken? Do you believe that every registrar must be
accredited. Does this include all ISPs that bundle registrar services
into their service packages? Are customers going to be releieved of
all needs to demand that their registrars acti in the interests of
their customers? If yes, how are you gong to enforce your standards
of service? Who is going to pay for the enforcement system?
}3.should we have have a code of conduct for registrars ?
}
I gather that you assume the answer is yes? Why do you assume this?
}4.how do you feel we should insure that there is equity in situations where
}the registry also competes at the registrar level ?
What is wrong with volumen discount plans for Registrars?
}5.how do we insure "portability" so that domain name holders are assured
}that they will be provided adequate information on alternatives available to
}them for future registration servicing ?
Why is this such a hard problem. Why cannot this be left as a
prioduct differenctiation feature for registrars? Why does all this
control have to be imposed from the top?
}
}best wishes
}
}ken stubbs
}
Just checking;-)...\Stef
}
}>ICANN has greatly exceeded its mandate to deal with the
}>NSI monopoly. It appears to have established an entire
}>business model for all ICANN registrars, one that makes
}>ICANN the owner of all IP data, and assesses a tax on
}>all registrants without *any* checks and balances.
}>
}>Respectfully,
}>
}>Jay Fenello
}>President, Iperdome, Inc.
}>404-943-0524 http://www.iperdome.com
}>
}>
}
